Skip to main content

Market-neutral small-business guide

Scope Change Quote Checklist

Record and cost added work, compare absorb, partial-charge and full re-quote paths, then stop for approval.

Scope-change quote checklist

1. Record the request

  • Record the requester, date and exact deliverable or service change. (not complete)
  • Link the request to the current quote, statement of work or approved baseline. (not complete)
  • Identify the original inclusion, exclusion, assumption or acceptance condition affected. (not complete)
  • Record why the change is needed without assigning unsupported blame. (not complete)

2. Assess the effect

  • Estimate added or removed labour by task and role. (not complete)
  • Estimate materials, subcontractors, equipment and other direct cost changes. (not complete)
  • Record schedule, dependency, revision and acceptance effects. (not complete)
  • Compare absorb, shared-charge and full-change scenarios where commercially relevant. (not complete)
  • Check capacity and the effect on other committed work. (not complete)

3. Prepare and approve the change

  • State the revised deliverable, exclusions, assumptions and completion evidence. (not complete)
  • State the additional or reduced price and its tax and payment basis. (not complete)
  • State the revised schedule and dependencies. (not complete)
  • Identify the authorised approver and required approval method. (not complete)
  • Pause if approval is missing, ambiguous or outside the agreed authority. (not complete)

4. Update the delivery baseline

  • Attach the approval to the current job record. (not complete)
  • Update tasks, schedule, budget and responsible people. (not complete)
  • Keep the original and revised baselines identifiable. (not complete)
  • Capture actual added work in the same categories used for the change estimate. (not complete)
  • Include the change in the final estimate-to-actual review. (not complete)

Printable change summary

Scope-change summary fields
FieldRecord before work continues
Change reference____________________________
Baseline quote or scope____________________________
Requested change____________________________
Added or removed work____________________________
Price effect and basis____________________________
Schedule effect____________________________
New assumptions or exclusions____________________________
Approver and approval record____________________________
Delivery baseline updated by____________________________

Illustrative completed change summary

This fictional scenario uses user-labelled assumptions in generic currency units. It is not a legal form or recommended price.

Example change record
FieldIllustrative entry
BaselineOne approved workshop and one workflow map
Requested changeAdd a second workshop for a new team
Delivery effectEight added hours and a three-day schedule extension
Direct-cost effectUser estimate of 800
Commercial responseIssue a change quote before scheduling
Approval recordNamed authorised approver and dated confirmation required

Price the changed work without erasing the original project

Keep the accepted baseline intact and model the change as an incremental decision. Record added and removed labour, direct cost, capacity and schedule effects once; then compare absorb, partial-charge and full-change scenarios. This isolates the economics of the request without silently repricing unrelated work.

Economic boundary for a scope-change decision
RecordIncludeDo not rewrite
Original baselineAccepted scope, price, planned cost, schedule and approval evidenceDo not replace it with the changed total
Incremental changeAdded or removed tasks, cost, capacity, timing and payment effectsDo not include original work again
Commercial scenariosAbsorb, partial-charge and full-change results on the same incremental basisDo not treat one scenario as an entitlement or legal conclusion
Approved revised baselineOriginal baseline plus the authorised incremental changeDo not start added work from an unapproved total

Calculate and reconcile the change

After the accepted baseline and incremental change are reconciled, use the Scope Creep Impact Planner to compare the entered labour, direct-cost, capacity, schedule and commercial effect. The result does not create a contractual charging right: retain the approval sequence above and stop when authority, terms or legal effect are unclear.

Related tools

Frequently asked questions

Does every small request need a full new proposal?
Use the governance proportionate to the engagement, but still record whether the request is included, absorbed or charged and who approved the decision. Repeated small changes can become a material overrun.
What if the change is urgent?
Use any agreed urgent-change process and record the authorised exception, scope and follow-up. Urgency should not turn an unrecorded assumption into approval.

Calculation methods used with this checklist

Change history

  1. Expanded the existing canonical owner with a bounded decision workflow, clearer interpretation boundaries and exact tool or methodology hand-offs without creating a competing article intent.
  2. Initial public release of the article after pre-launch factual, editorial, source and presentation review.