Skip to main content

US companion guide

US Service Pricing and Self-Employment Boundaries

Keep service-price recovery maths separate from worker status, self-employment tax and estimated-payment timing.

Start with the global decision boundary

The global service-pricing framework owns the cost, capacity, utilisation, scope and contribution calculation. US worker classification and self-employed tax timing are separate legal and tax boundaries; neither supplies a universal pricing uplift.

Apply the exact local rule delta

Local checks that sit outside the global calculation
Local questionReviewed source boundaryPlanning action
Is the worker an independent contractor?IRS guidance says classification depends on the facts, including the degree of control over what is done and how it is done.Stop and resolve worker status before relying on a self-employed pricing model.
Which obligations are separate?IRS guidance distinguishes annual income-tax filing, estimated payments and self-employment tax.Keep each obligation outside the business recovery calculation until assessed.
When does cash leave?Federal tax is generally paid as income is earned, and estimated tax uses four payment periods.Model payment timing separately from annual profit and price.
What does broad QCEW wage context add?The governed 2024 national private-industry data excludes self-employed workers and employer non-wage contributions.Use it only to choose a broad peer context; never turn it into a quote, local rate or total-cost benchmark.
How should estimated and actual project cost connect?The quote owns the estimate; the completed job record owns actual cost and margin.Hand the approved quote scenario to job costing and reconcile variance before changing a future price.

Stop checks before using the scenario

  • Confirm worker classification from the real relationship facts. (not complete)
  • Build service recovery from business records and capacity, not a tax multiplier. (not complete)
  • Use QCEW only as broad context; do not copy a wage row into the quote. (not complete)
  • Reconcile the approved estimate against actual job cost after delivery. (not complete)
  • Identify income-tax and self-employment-tax obligations separately. (not complete)
  • Map estimated-payment timing as dated cash outflows. (not complete)
  • Use non-identifying internal codes in the cash and receivables template. (not complete)
  • Obtain appropriate tax or legal review before relying on the scenario. (not complete)

Test a labelled local scenario

Local boundary example

This is a reproducible planning example using stated facts. It is not a market benchmark, eligibility decision, legal conclusion or tax calculation.

Illustrative separation of price recovery and tax timing
Scenario itemStated base caseBoundary or next check
Service recovery modelUser-entered costs, sellable hours and scopeNo tax multiplier is embedded
Worker classificationConfirmed from the actual factsStop if the relationship is unresolved
Quote and invoiceHypothetical project scope, quote and invoice issue dateThe service planner owns the quote; the job-cost tool owns actual variance
Expected customer receiptUser-entered forecast dateA delayed receipt changes cash timing, not an automatic price uplift or legal charge
Estimated-tax paymentUser-confirmed amount and dateA separate cash event; no liability or deadline is calculated by this article

Use the registered planner after the boundary is confirmed

Local boundary questions

What percentage should a self-employed person add for tax?
This guide supplies no universal percentage. Tax depends on facts outside the pricing model; assess obligations separately and use the service planner for business recovery.
Can a contract label decide independent-contractor status?
No. IRS guidance says the facts and degree of control matter. Resolve the actual relationship rather than relying on a label alone.

Reviewed official sources

Change history

  1. โ€” Added governed QCEW context, estimate-to-actual job-cost hand-off, dated receipt and tax-payment cash events, and the privacy-safe US receivables template.
  2. โ€” Initial public release of the article after pre-launch factual, editorial, source and presentation review.