Act on the result
Choose option emphasis using expected contribution, not price alone.
Educational only: Business decision support, not accounting, tax or legal advice.
Privacy: No account is required. Tool inputs and results stay in this browser. Anonymous categorical usage analytics send only governed page, tool, cluster and action identifiers; tool inputs and results are never sent. Error monitoring is disabled. Optional saved state stays only on this device.
Update policy: Reviewed when formulas or official dependencies change.
Scope: Market-neutral small-business planning using your own assumptions.
Service owners comparing good, better and best proposal options.
Contribution per win and expected contribution for good, better and best, adjacent deltas and the match threshold.
Enter price, delivery cost and expected wins separately for the good, better and best options.
Use a different tool when: Do not use this to price best, base and worst project duration exposure; use Project Duration Risk Planner for that decision. Use this tool to compare proposal option economics.
Quote & capacity
Contribution per win and expected contribution for good, better and best, adjacent deltas and the match threshold.
Amounts use the same currency as your inputs. No currency conversion is performed.
Compare expected contribution across good, better and best proposal options.
Your numbers stay in this browser
Client price.
Expected delivery cost.
Wins in the period.
Client price.
Expected delivery cost.
Wins in the period.
Client price.
Expected delivery cost.
Wins in the period.
Every result is derived by the registered service and project engine.
Each row names the assumption axis changed from the baseline.
Save these results, change an input, then compare the updated figures with this baseline.
The baseline is temporary in this tab and is not added to shared scenario links or generated reports.
good price โ good cost2,000/projectReports/project from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โbetter price โ better cost2,700/projectReports/project from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โbest price โ best cost3,500/projectReports/project from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โgood contribution ร expected wins8,000/periodReports/period from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โbetter contribution ร expected wins8,100/periodReports/period from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โbest contribution ร expected wins10,500/periodReports/period from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โbetter expected โ good expected contribution100/periodReports/period from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โbest expected โ better expected contribution2,400/periodReports/period from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โgood expected contribution รท best contribution per win2.29 countReports count from the entered project, capacity and ex-tax commercial assumptions. The engine retains full precision; presentation is bounded for readability.
Proposal Option Profitability Planner formulas โThis calculator supports documented, shareable scenario URLs. Compatible assistants and applications can construct links using the parameters below.
Scenario links contain only allowlisted numeric and closed-choice inputs shown in the URL; Margin101 excludes free text and identifying fields. Anyone you share the URL with can read those numbers, so do not include private or identifying data.
| Parameter | Meaning | Unit | Allowed values | Presence | Default |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bestOptionCost | Expected delivery cost. | currency units/win | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 4500 |
| bestOptionExpectedWins | Wins in the period. | wins/period | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 3 |
| bestOptionPrice | Client price. | currency units/win | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 8000 |
| betterOptionCost | Expected delivery cost. | currency units/win | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 3800 |
| betterOptionExpectedWins | Wins in the period. | wins/period | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 3 |
| betterOptionPrice | Client price. | currency units/win | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 6500 |
| goodOptionCost | Expected delivery cost. | currency units/win | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 3000 |
| goodOptionExpectedWins | Wins in the period. | wins/period | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 4 |
| goodOptionPrice | Client price. | currency units/win | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 5000 |
The proposal option profitability result uses only the entered commercial assumptions.
Data used here
Choose option emphasis using expected contribution, not price alone.
Lower better/best expected wins and raise their delivery costs.
Educational estimate, not advice. See all assumptions & limitations โ
Guides to interpret the decision and its assumptions.
Turn cost and sellable capacity into a service rate, then test scope, duration, delivery risk and commercial model.
Read guideChoose option emphasis using expected contribution, not price alone.
Compare a plausible alternative scenario and verify the decision-critical assumption that changes the plan most.