Act on the result
Compare payback with cash capacity and the break-even demand required at the new site.
Educational only: Business decision support, not accounting, tax or legal advice.
Privacy: No account is required. Tool inputs and results stay in this browser. Anonymous categorical usage analytics send only governed page, tool, cluster and action identifiers; tool inputs and results are never sent. Error monitoring is disabled. Optional saved state stays only on this device.
Update policy: Reviewed when formulas or official dependencies change.
Scope: Market-neutral small-business planning using your own assumptions.
Operators testing the incremental viability of an additional location.
Incremental contribution, fixed-cost coverage, upfront investment, payback and break-even.
Enter only new-location revenue, costs, investment and capacity without borrowing performance from the existing location.
Use a different tool when: Do not use this to test one location break-even threshold; use Location Break-even Planner for that decision. Use this tool to test the incremental economics and payback of an additional location.
Profit & break-even
Incremental contribution, fixed-cost coverage, upfront investment, payback and break-even.
Amounts use the same currency as your inputs. No currency conversion is performed.
Stress-test a proposed location using capacity, demand realisation, cannibalisation, monthly contribution and setup-cost payback.
Your numbers stay in this browser
Enter one-off incremental setup expenditure. Use one consistent ex-tax currency basis.
Enter new fixed cost for one month. Use one consistent ex-tax currency basis.
Enter whole units the proposed location can serve each month.
Enter a whole-unit demand scenario before applying risk realisation.
Enter revenue less avoidable cost per additional unit. Use one consistent ex-tax currency basis.
Enter whole units expected to move from an existing location.
Enter the share of the demand scenario expected to materialise.
Review the operating threshold and incremental comparison on the same entered capacity, cost and demand basis.
Each row names the assumption axis changed from the baseline.
Save these results, change an input, then compare the updated figures with this baseline.
The baseline is temporary in this tab and is not added to shared scenario links or generated reports.
min(monthly capacity, expected monthly demand ร demand realisation rate)120 units/monthUses the exact shared engine result and only the entered market-neutral operating assumptions. The engine retains raw precision; display formatting does not feed calculation.
Location Expansion Scenario Planner formulas โmin(risk-adjusted new units, cannibalised existing units)20 units/monthUses the exact shared engine result and only the entered market-neutral operating assumptions. The engine retains raw precision; display formatting does not feed calculation.
Location Expansion Scenario Planner formulas โ(risk-adjusted new units โ displaced units) ร contribution per unit โ monthly fixed cost1,000/month, ex taxUses the exact shared engine result and only the entered market-neutral operating assumptions. The engine retains raw precision; display formatting does not feed calculation.
Location Expansion Scenario Planner formulas โsetup cost / positive monthly incremental contribution10 monthsUses the exact shared engine result and only the entered market-neutral operating assumptions. The engine retains raw precision; display formatting does not feed calculation.
Location Expansion Scenario Planner formulas โrisk-adjusted new units / monthly capacity0.6 percentUses the exact shared engine result and only the entered market-neutral operating assumptions. The engine retains raw precision; display formatting does not feed calculation.
Location Expansion Scenario Planner formulas โThis calculator supports documented, shareable scenario URLs. Compatible assistants and applications can construct links using the parameters below.
Scenario links contain only allowlisted numeric and closed-choice inputs shown in the URL; Margin101 excludes free text and identifying fields. Anyone you share the URL with can read those numbers, so do not include private or identifying data.
| Parameter | Meaning | Unit | Allowed values | Presence | Default |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cannibalisedExistingUnits | Enter whole units expected to move from an existing location. | units/month | 0 to 100000000 | Required | 20 |
| contributionPerUnit | Enter revenue less avoidable cost per additional unit. Use one consistent ex-tax currency basis. | currency units/unit, ex tax | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 20 |
| expectedMonthlyDemandUnits | Enter a whole-unit demand scenario before applying risk realisation. | units/month | 0 to 100000000 | Required | 150 |
| monthlyCapacityUnits | Enter whole units the proposed location can serve each month. | units/month | 0 to 100000000 | Required | 200 |
| monthlyFixedCost | Enter new fixed cost for one month. Use one consistent ex-tax currency basis. | currency units/month, ex tax | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 1000 |
| riskRealisationRate | Enter the share of the demand scenario expected to materialise. | decimal fraction of expected monthly demand (1 = 100%) | 0 to 1 | Required | 0.8 |
| setupCost | Enter one-off incremental setup expenditure. Use one consistent ex-tax currency basis. | currency units/one-off location setup, ex tax | 0 to 10000000 | Required | 10000 |
Treat the new location as an incremental scenario; existing-location revenue is not automatically transferable.
Data used here
Compare payback with cash capacity and the break-even demand required at the new site.
Retest slower ramp-up, higher fixed cost and cannibalisation.
Educational estimate, not advice. See all assumptions & limitations โ
Guides to interpret the decision and its assumptions.
Record demand, contribution, dated cash, capacity, people, operations and explicit stop conditions without an authoritative score.
Read guideCompare expansion with improving the current location using contribution, capacity, cash and downside evidence.
Read guideCompare payback with cash capacity and the break-even demand required at the new site.
Compare a plausible alternative scenario and verify the decision-critical assumption that changes the plan most.